联想 Yoga Tab Plus 评测

联想 Yoga Tab Plus 评测

联想 Yoga Tab Plus 评测--经济实惠的巨型平板电脑挑战 iPad Pro多媒体品质。 六个扬声器、高分辨率、无闪烁显示屏和充足的电量足以让联想 Yoga Tab Plus 在流媒体爱好者和工作狂心中占据一席之地。此外,它还配备了全面的配件包,价格也相对较低。Apple 应该感到震惊吗?Florian Schmitt, 👁 Florian Schmitt (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy) Published 02/09/2025 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

🇫🇷 🇪🇸 🇵🇹 🇮🇹 🇳🇱 🇵🇱 🇹🇷 🇸🇪 🇭🇺 🇷🇺 Android ARM Tablet

联想 Yoga Tab Plus 的评价不仅 iPad Pro 要面对一个新的强劲竞争对手,Android 厂商也要有所顾忌:联想 Yoga Tab Plus 功能丰富、配件齐全、性能卓越,而价格却大大低于其他专为工作和娱乐设计的高端平板电脑。

此外,你几乎无需做出任何妥协:它的屏幕分辨率高、亮度高,联想 Tab Pen Pro 精确度高,反馈效果好,电池续航时间长,扬声器音质饱满,平板电脑的软件可定制性很强。

Test device courtesy of Lenovo Deutschland

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

当然,对于一款高端设备来说,你可能期望的不仅仅是四年的更新,如果你要同时处理几个大型项目,256 GB 的存储空间可能也不够用。此外,它的 IPS 屏幕无法显示完美的黑色,在显示 HDR 内容时也无法像竞争对手的 OLED 屏幕那样亮丽。

不过,联想平板电脑的价格不到 700 美元,你可以接受它的小瑕疵,尤其是当你看到竞争对手的设备价格如此昂贵时。如果你正在寻找一款高品质、设计时尚、设备齐全的高级平板电脑,那么你绝对应该考虑联想 Yoga Tab Plus。

Pros+ 超级强大

+ 光滑的金属外壳

+ 良好的音响系统

+ 丰富的配件包

+ 价格相对低廉

+ 自适应软件

+ 存储速度快

+ 负载时几乎不发热

+ 运行时间长

+ 无 PWM 闪烁

+ 可进行 120Hz 游戏Cons- 沉重

- 无法扩展存储空间

- 更新承诺差

- 显示屏黑度较高

- 保修期仅为 12 个月

价格和供应情况联想 Yoga Tab Plus 目前在联想网站上的售价为 599.99 美元。

可能的替代品比较

ImageModel / ReviewPriceWeightDriveDisplay

1.86.4%Lenovo Yoga Tab PlusQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 750 ⎘12 GB Memory, 256 GB Amazon: 1. $199.99Lenovo Idea Tab Plus - Light...2. $279.99Lenovo Idea Tab Pro with Goo...3. $14.98JETech Screen Protector for ...List Price: 799€640 g256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash12.70"2944x1840273 PPIIPS

2.82.3%Huawei MatePad Pro 12.2 2024HiSilicon Kirin 9000W ⎘ HiSilicon Maleoon 910 ⎘12 GB Memory, 512 GB Amazon: 1. $9.99Protective Case for Huawei M...2. $9.96Kepuch Tempered Glass Screen...3. $26.99Compatible with Huawei Matep...List Price: 999€512 g512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash12.20"2800x1840274 PPIOLED

3.89.2%Apple iPad Pro 13 2024Apple M4 (10 cores) ⎘ Apple M4 10-core GPU ⎘16 GB Memory, 1024 GBAmazon: $1,299.00List Price: 2279€579 g1 TB NAND Flash13.00"2752x2064265 PPITandem OLED

4.84.8%Honor MagicPad 2Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 735 ⎘12 GB Memory, 256 GB Amazon: 1. $23.99Smart Tablet Case for Honor ...2. $11.96Kepuch 2 Pack Tempered Glass...3. $19.58Screen Protector for Honor M...List Price: 600€555 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash12.30"3000x1920290 PPIOLED

5.85.2%Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+MediaTek Dimensity 9300+ ⎘ ARM Immortalis-G720 MP12 ⎘12 GB Memory, 256 GB Amazon: 1. $891.43Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+ Plus...2. $349.99Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Lite,...3. $279.99Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Lite,...List Price: 1119€571 g256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash12.40"2800x1752266 PPIDynamic AMOLED 2X

Table of Contents联想 Yoga Tab Plus 的评价规格外壳 - 非常大,质量上乘连接性 - 快速存储和快速 USB 端口软件 - 更新至Android 17通信 - 机上 WiFi 7摄像头 - 可用于平板电脑配件和保修 - 仅提供 12 个月的安全保障输入设备和操作 - 通过触摸屏、笔和键盘实现出色的操作显示屏 - 无 PWM 的 IPS 面板性能 - 快速 SoC 和快速存储游戏 - 超级流畅的游戏排放 - 负载情况下几乎不加热电池寿命 - 负载消耗大,运行时间长Notebookcheck 总评分

4 Reviews ← exclude selected types

联想的平板电脑以价格低廉、质量上乘而著称。现在,12.7 英寸的 Yoga Tab Plus 也在向市场上一些最昂贵的平板电脑发起挑战:例如 Apple iPad Pro和 三星Galaxy Tab S10+.

联想再一次成功地大幅压低了竞争对手的价格,甚至包括手写笔和键盘盖。在这次评测中,我们将仔细研究这款测试设备是否能真正跟上高品质娱乐和生产力平板电脑的步伐。

规格

Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus (Yoga Tab Series)ProcessorQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, 1 x 3.3 GHz ARM Cortex-X4, 3 x 3.2 GHz ARM Cortex-A720, 2 x 3.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A720, 2 x 2.3 GHz ARM Cortex-A520, Cortex-X4 / A720 / A720 / A520 (Kryo)Graphics adapterQualcomm Adreno 750Memory12 GB Display12.70 inch 16:10, 2944 x 1840 pixel 273 PPI, capacitive touchscreen, IPS, glossy: yes, HDR, 144 HzStorage256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash, 256 GB , 200 GB freeConnections1 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 DisplayPort, 1 Docking Station Port, Audio Connections: audio via USB-C, 1 Fingerprint Reader, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: acceleration sensor, hall sensor, position sensor, color sensorNetworking802.11 a/​b/​g/​n/​ac/​ax/​be (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz be = Wi-Fi 7), Bluetooth 5.4Sizeheight x width x depth (in mm): 6.69 x 290.9 x 188.3Battery10200 mAh Lithium-Polymer, 45 watt chargingChargingfast charging / QuickchargeOperating SystemAndroid 14CameraPrimary Camera: 13 MPix flash (camera 1), 2 megapixels, flash (camera 2) Secondary Camera: 13 MPixAdditional featuresSpeakers: 6 speakers (2 tweeters, 4 subwoofers), Keyboard folio, pen, USB cable, 12 Months Warranty, fanlessWeight640 g

Price799 EuroLinksLenovo homepageNote: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.see all specifications

外壳 - 非常大,质量上乘在联想 Yoga Tab Plus 的配色方面,联想从大海中汲取了灵感:"潮汐绿 "是一种略带绿色的蓝色,而 "贝壳 "则是一种米色。

它正面的屏幕边框非常纤薄,给平板电脑带来了现代感。同时,这些边框使平板电脑可以握在手中,而不会经常意外操作触摸屏。

平板电脑的金属外壳整体做工非常精致,非常时尚,而上部的大面积玻璃条则赋予了它与众不同的设计。这部分还放置了摄像头模块。对于一款近 13 英寸的平板电脑来说,它的稳定性还算不错,但在扭动和强力按压时仍能听到明显的吱吱声。

该设备重达 640 克,相当沉重。 iPad Pro屏幕更大,重量却比它轻 85 克。这款平板电脑没有通过 IP 认证,因此不能在多尘或潮湿的环境中使用。

» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名

尺寸比较

Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+ Apple iPad Pro 13 2024 Honor MagicPad 2 Huawei MatePad Pro 12.2 2024 DIN A4 ❌

连接性 - 快速存储和快速 USB 端口联想推出的 Yoga Tab Plus 配备 12 GB 内存和 256 GB 大容量存储。此外,还提供存储容量更大的 512 GB 版本。由于没有用于扩展存储空间的 microSD 插槽,您只能使用这些存储容量。

USB 端口通过 USB 3.2 Gen 1 内部连接,数据吞吐量最高可达 5 GBit/s。此外,该端口还可用于使用 DisplayPort 连接外部显示器,并可通过 Miracast 与显示器进行无线通信。

平板电脑底部有三个 Pogo 针,可用于连接键盘底座。没有配备用于无线支付的 NFC 功能。

顶部:音量按钮、2 个麦克风、磁性笔架

底部:附件连接

右:扬声器、USB-C 接口、扬声器

左:2 个扬声器,待机键

软件 - 更新至Android 17Android 14 是平板电脑操作系统的基础。联想称其界面为 ZUI,特别适合在设备的大屏幕上使用:应用程序可以在各自的窗口中启动,屏幕底部的任务栏包含最常用的应用程序,界面还具有鼠标和键盘模式。不过,你可以通过设置停用很多功能,给你一个相对纯粹的 感觉。Android

联想提供如此多的设置选项也很不错,因为并不是所有的应用程序都能顺利地与窗口模式和任务栏兼容;例如,3DMark 就会部分隐藏其控件。虽然没有预装任何第三方赞助软件,但联想还是为平板电脑的特殊功能定制了一些应用程序,例如针对手写笔的绘图程序。

当连接键盘时,软件会切换到特殊的 PC 模式,该模式针对使用鼠标(或触摸板)和键盘操作进行了优化。

根据制造商提供的信息,Yoga Tab Plus 的更新将持续到 2029 年 1 月 31 日,即在测试时持续约 4 年。此外,还保证提供直至Android 17 的主要更新。

可持续性虽然联想会计算其产品在使用过程中的碳足迹,而且通常会提供相关数据,但在撰写本报告时,Yoga Tab Plus 还没有(尚未)提供相关数据。

遗憾的是,关于联想产品中含有多少可回收材料,目前还没有具体信息。这款平板电脑的包装基本上没有印刷,由再生纸板组成。

联想通常会提供自修指南,但这些指南往往与制造商的笔记本电脑有关。您也可以直接在联想网站上搜索备件,但目前还没有 Yoga Tab Plus 的备件。

通信 - 机上 WiFi 7Yoga Tab Plus 配备了 WiFi 7 作为其最快的 Wi-Fi 标准,这意味着它还可以访问目前仍很少使用的 6 GHz 频段。遗憾的是,我们的参考路由器华硕 ROG Rapture AXE11000 只支持 WiFi 6E,因此我们无法确定该平板电脑的最高 Wi-Fi 速度。

即便如此,Yoga Tab Plus 在使用 WiFi 6E 的 6 GHz 频段内仍实现了高达 1,731 MBit/s 的高速传输速率。这意味着你可以轻松实现千兆级网络连接的最大速度,而且它完全可以在速度更快的内部网络中使用。在接收方向上,我们测得的最高速度为 1,188 MBit/s,其他设备都大大超过了这一速度。

总的来说,它的 WLAN 模块的传输速率往往不太稳定,在多次重复测试时,我们注意到它的数据传输速率有些下降。

与大多数其他联想平板电脑不同,Yoga Tab Plus 没有用于确定位置的 GNSS 模块,因此你只能通过已知的 Wi-Fi 网络从谷歌获得大致位置。该平板电脑也没有蜂窝模块。

Networking

iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHzSamsung Galaxy Tab S10+802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax

1759 (1709min - 1788max) MBit/s +10%Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus802.11 a/​b/​g/​n/​ac/​ax/​be

1598 (1108min, 1152.08P1 - 1731max) MBit/s Average 802.11 a/​b/​g/​n/​ac/​ax/​be (508 - 1905, n=37)

1280 MBit/s -20%Average of class Tablet (330 - 1898, n=32, last 2 years)

1240 MBit/s -22%Apple iPad Pro 13 2024Wi-Fi 6E

1196 (901min - 1327max) MBit/s -25% iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHzSamsung Galaxy Tab S10+802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax

1782 (936min - 1875max) MBit/s +86%Average 802.11 a/​b/​g/​n/​ac/​ax/​be (719 - 1873, n=37)

1447 MBit/s +51%Average of class Tablet (291 - 1874, n=32, last 2 years)

1431 MBit/s +49%Apple iPad Pro 13 2024Wi-Fi 6E

978 (615min - 1142max) MBit/s +2%Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus802.11 a/​b/​g/​n/​ac/​ax/​be

960 (700min, 702.32P1 - 1188max) MBit/s

Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz: Ø1598 (1108-1731) Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz: Ø960 (700-1188)

摄像头 - 可用于平板电脑使用前置摄像头拍摄的照片对于平板电脑来说,摄像头是个小问题,尤其是当它们这么大的时候:在智能手机方便快捷的时代,谁会愿意拖着一个四倍大的设备去拍照呢?即便如此,联想 Yoga Tab Plus 仍配备了一个后置摄像头和一个自拍摄像头,用于扫描文件、视频会议和捕捉快照。

背面实际上有两个摄像头:除了 1300 万像素的主镜头外,还有一个 200 万像素的辅助镜头,不过你不能用后者拍照。

在光线充足的环境下,主摄像头拍摄的照片效果相当不错,但仔细观察就会发现细节不多,明亮的地方很快就会曝光过度。在较暗的环境中,它在极亮和极暗区域的动态效果方面的问题就更加明显了:这两个区域几乎没有任何细节。在光线完美的摄影棚中,主摄像头显示出良好的对比度,但一些细节有些模糊。

您可以录制最高 30fps 的 4K 视频。自动对焦反应非常迅速,而且不易察觉,亮度调节也能跟上。即使在光线不太理想的情况下,其整体质量也不错。

前置摄像头拍摄的照片具有一定的细节,但动态范围还可以再大一些。

Image comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Main camera plantMain camera surroundingsMain camera low lightclick to load imagesLenovo Yoga Tab PlusApple iPhone 16 ProHonor Magic6 ProCanon EOS 600D0.2x2 MPixel4 Mpixel1xclick to load imagesLenovo Yoga Tab PlusApple iPhone 16 ProHonor Magic6 ProCanon EOS 600D0.2x2 MPixel4 Mpixel1xclick to load imagesLenovo Yoga Tab PlusApple iPhone 16 ProHonor Magic6 ProCanon EOS 600D0.2x2 MPixel4 Mpixel1x

15.7 ∆E10.5 ∆E15.3 ∆E16.7 ∆E13.6 ∆E7.8 ∆E10.9 ∆E17 ∆E16.1 ∆E12.7 ∆E8.9 ∆E7.5 ∆E9.2 ∆E12.3 ∆E17.9 ∆E4.3 ∆E14.8 ∆E12.4 ∆E5.2 ∆E6.5 ∆E10.5 ∆E11.9 ∆E7 ∆E2.8 ∆EColorChecker Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus: 11.14 ∆E min: 2.77 - max: 17.91 ∆E29.1 ∆E53.9 ∆E38.8 ∆E34.3 ∆E44.7 ∆E61.5 ∆E52.9 ∆E35.7 ∆E43.3 ∆E28.6 ∆E64.2 ∆E63.3 ∆E31.2 ∆E46.8 ∆E36.9 ∆E76.1 ∆E43.7 ∆E41.5 ∆E86.9 ∆E69.8 ∆E51.5 ∆E36.4 ∆E23.3 ∆E12.8 ∆EColorChecker Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus: 46.13 ∆E min: 12.77 - max: 86.94 ∆E

Lenovo Yoga Tab PlusLenovo Yoga Tab Plus

配件和保修 - 仅提供 12 个月的安全保障联想 Yoga Tab Plus 不带充电器,但配有 USB 数据线和触控笔。我们的测试设备还附带了键盘底座,它有一个触摸板,还可以用作保护盖。奇怪的是,底座是单独出售的。一方面,这意味着你可以在没有键盘的情况下安装平板电脑。另一方面,这也使整个系统的稳定性稍差。

支架是用磁力吸附在背面的,但在我们的测试机型上并没有完全固定到位,这通常不是问题,但看起来还是很奇怪。

联想为其设备提供 12 个月的保修服务。

输入设备和操作 - 通过触摸屏、笔和键盘实现出色的操作带键盘底座和笔的联想 Yoga Tab Plus屏幕的最大帧频为 144 Hz,因此在显示命令时不会出现任何明显的延迟。触摸屏的灵敏度非常高,可在边缘位置进行可靠操作。

随附的联想 Tab Pen Pro 必须通过蓝牙与设备连接,可通过磁力吸附在平板电脑顶部并进行充电,它提供了一系列有趣的功能:首先,它能识别 4,096 个压力和倾斜级别,而且握在手中非常舒适,电池续航时间长达 35 小时,还集成了振动电机和触摸感应表面,可提供反馈。

您可以使用触摸感应表面执行命令,例如快速复制和粘贴文本。该笔可用于精确书写和绘图,在兼容程序中甚至会产生轻微的阻力,就像真正的纸张一样。

键盘底座上的触摸板支持多指手势,有两个点击按钮,工作非常精确。顶部有一排功能键,例如屏幕亮度或音量键。按键的行程出奇地长,按压点也很明显。

您可以使用待机键上的指纹传感器或面部识别来解锁平板电脑。这两种方式在设置后都能可靠地工作。

键盘横向模式键盘纵向模式

显示屏 - 无 PWM 的 IPS 面板子像素阵列联想 Yoga Tab Plus 的显示屏非常漂亮,对角线为 12.7 英寸,分辨率高达 2,944 x 1,840 像素。

与大多数竞争对手不同,联想没有采用 OLED 显示屏,而是使用了 IPS 面板。这有一些小缺点:在显示 HDR 内容时,面板的最大亮度不够高,色彩还原也不够准确。那些已经习惯了 OLED 面板明亮色彩和深邃黑色的用户必须学会接受这一点。

与此同时,该面板的亮度足以在明亮的环境中使用,在显示全白时可达到 726 cd/m²,在显示较小的摘录(APL 18)时可达到 905 cd/m²,这对于 HDR 内容来说已经足够。

702cd/m²669cd/m²671cd/m²711cd/m²726cd/m²686cd/m²684cd/m²663cd/m²705cd/m²

Distribution of brightnesstested with X-Rite i1Pro 2Maximum: 726 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 690.8 cd/m² Minimum: 1.44 cd/m²Brightness Distribution: 91 %Center on Battery: 726 cd/m²Contrast: 1320:1 (Black: 0.55 cd/m²)ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 4.67 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.77}ΔE Greyscale Calman: 1.8 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø5}98.5% sRGB (Calman 2D)Gamma: 2.249CCT: 6382 K

Lenovo Yoga Tab PlusIPS, 2944x1840, 12.7"Huawei MatePad Pro 12.2 2024OLED, 2800x1840, 12.2"Apple iPad Pro 13 2024Tandem OLED, 2752x2064, 13"Honor MagicPad 2OLED, 3000x1920, 12.3"Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+Dynamic AMOLED 2X, 2800x1752, 12.4"Screen33%39%23%-11%Brightness middle (cd/m²)726988 36%1000 38%645 -11%471 -35%Brightness (cd/m²)6911003 45%1010 46%650 -6%473 -32%Brightness Distribution (%)9195 4%98 8%94 3%97 7%Black Level * (cd/m²)0.55Contrast (:1)1320Colorchecker dE 2000 *4.671.2 74%1 79%1.3 72%3.1 34%Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *5.62.5 55%2.5 55%2.1 62%5.8 -4%Greyscale dE 2000 *1.82.1 -17%1.7 6%1.5 17%2.4 -33%Gamma2.249 98%2.22 99%2.21 100%2.25 98%2.06 107%CCT6382 102%6882 94%6661 98%6658 98%6746 96%* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)ℹTo dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.Screen flickering / PWM not detectedIn comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8042 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

我们使用分光光度计和 CalMAN 软件进行了测试,结果显示几乎没有明显的灰度偏差,但在显示多种颜色时,显示效果有些偏暖。在 0.55 cd/m² 下,黑色也明显偏灰。

在这块屏幕上,即使亮度很低,也不会出现 PWM 闪烁。不过,与 OLED 面板相比,玩家必须做好响应时间稍慢的准备。

卡尔曼灰度

CalMAN 色彩精度

CalMAN sRGB 色彩空间

CalMAN AdobeRGB 色彩空间

CalMAN DCI P3 色彩空间

CalMAN 饱和度

Display Response TimesℹDisplay response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times. ↔ Response Time Black to White26.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 12.4 ms rise↘ 14 ms fallThe screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers.In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 65 % of all devices are better.This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.1 ms). ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey33.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 18.7 ms rise↘ 15.1 ms fallThe screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 46 % of all devices are better.This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (31.5 ms).

在室外,平板电脑的最大亮度通常足以确保显示屏清晰可见。不过,由于显示屏反光较强,在阴凉处使用会更舒适。

从各个角度看,它的可视角度都不错。

室外

视角性能 - 快速 SoC 和快速存储联想 Yoga Tab Plus 采用了 高通骁龙 8 代 3作为 SoC。它的历史可以追溯到 2024 年,当时安装在许多高端智能手机上。因此,它仍然是一个非常强大的 SoC,这在处理器基准测试中非常明显:我们的测试设备通常是Android 竞争对手中速度最快的,仅次于 Apple iPad Pro 13.

这使得它可以轻松地同时处理多个复杂的应用程序,其充足的内存意味着即使是较大的文件也不成问题。

Geekbench 6.5 | Geekbench 5.5 | Antutu v10 | PCMark for Android | CrossMark | BaseMark OS II | UL Procyon AI Inference for Android | AImark | Geekbench AI | AI Benchmark Geekbench 6.5

Single-CoreApple iPad Pro 13 2024Apple M4 (10 cores), M4 10-Core GPU, 16384

3715 Points +68%Lenovo Yoga Tab PlusQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288

2213 Points Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+MediaTek Dimensity 9300+, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288

2167 Points -2%Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (954 - 2329, n=29)

2115 Points -4%Honor MagicPad 2Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288

1986 Points -10%Average of class Tablet (185 - 4128, n=97, last 2 years)

1551 Points -30%Huawei MatePad Pro 12.2 2024HiSilicon Kirin 9000W, Maleoon 910, 12288

1343 Points -39% Multi-CoreApple iPad Pro 13 2024Apple M4 (10 cores), M4 10-Core GPU, 16384

14690 Points +119%Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+MediaTek Dimensity 9300+, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288

7094 Points +6%Lenovo Yoga Tab PlusQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288

6723 Points Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4564 - 7501, n=29)

6608 Points -2%Honor MagicPad 2Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288

5166 Points -23%Average of class Tablet (848 - 16544, n=97, last 2 years)

4940 Points -27%Huawei MatePad Pro 12.2 2024HiSilicon Kirin 9000W, Maleoon 910, 12288

4370 Points -35%Geekbench 5.5

Single-CoreAverage Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (1343 - 1702, n=17)

1651 Points 0%Lenovo Yoga Tab PlusQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288

1644 Points Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+MediaTek Dimensity 9300+, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288

1632 Points -1%Honor MagicPad 2Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288

1447 Points -12%Average of class Tablet (103 - 2286, n=55, last 2 years)

1027 Points -38%Huawei MatePad Pro 12.2 2024HiSilicon Kirin 9000W, Maleoon 910, 12288

1006 Points -39% Multi-CoreSamsung Galaxy Tab S10+MediaTek Dimensity 9300+, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288

6678 Points +13%Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (5393 - 6543, n=17)

6007 Points +1%Lenovo Yoga Tab PlusQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288

5924 Points Honor MagicPad 2Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288

4460 Points -25%Huawei MatePad Pro 12.2 2024HiSilicon Kirin 9000W, Maleoon 910, 12288

3951 Points -33%Average of class Tablet (303 - 10522, n=55, last 2 years)

3925 Points -34%Antutu v10 - Total Score

Apple iPad Pro 13 2024Apple M4 (10 cores), M4 10-Core GPU, 16384

2716980 Points +44%Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (1390723 - 2162423, n=24)

1903138 Points +1%Lenovo Yoga Tab PlusQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288

1891925 Points Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+MediaTek Dimensity 9300+, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288

1726681 Points -9%Honor MagicPad 2Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288

1432569 Points -24%Average of class Tablet (167056 - 3475590, n=69, last 2 years)

1269277 Points -33%Huawei MatePad Pro 12.2 2024HiSilicon Kirin 9000W, Maleoon 910, 12288

734965 Points -61%PCMark for Android - Work 3.0

Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (12156 - 25683, n=28)

18063 Points +1%Lenovo Yoga Tab PlusQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288

17967 Points Honor MagicPad 2Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288

17329 Points -4%Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+MediaTek Dimensity 9300+, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288

16684 Points -7%Huawei MatePad Pro 12.2 2024HiSilicon Kirin 9000W, Maleoon 910, 12288

13858 Points -23%Average of class Tablet (5749 - 27428, n=75, last 2 years)

13306 Points -26%CrossMark - Overall

Apple iPad Pro 13 2024Apple M4 (10 cores), M4 10-Core GPU, 16384

1944 Points +36%Lenovo Yoga Tab PlusQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288

1431 Points Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+MediaTek Dimensity 9300+, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288

1342 Points -6%Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (951 - 1474, n=18)

1236 Points -14%Honor MagicPad 2Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288

1155 Points -19%Huawei MatePad Pro 12.2 2024HiSilicon Kirin 9000W, Maleoon 910, 12288

1028 Points -28%Average of class Tablet (227 - 2155, n=57, last 2 years)

979 Points -32%BaseMark OS II

OverallSamsung Galaxy Tab S10+MediaTek Dimensity 9300+, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288

11606 Points +11%Lenovo Yoga Tab PlusQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288

10498 Points Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (8088 - 10966, n=21)

9864 Points -6%Honor MagicPad 2Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288

9147 Points -13%Huawei MatePad Pro 12.2 2024HiSilicon Kirin 9000W, Maleoon 910, 12288

6464 Points -38%Average of class Tablet (195 - 13159, n=65, last 2 years)

6325 Points -40% SystemSamsung Galaxy Tab S10+MediaTek Dimensity 9300+, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288

15736 Points +6%Lenovo Yoga Tab PlusQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288

14858 Points Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (8611 - 16015, n=21)

13633 Points -8%Honor MagicPad 2Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288

13141 Points -12%Huawei MatePad Pro 12.2 2024HiSilicon Kirin 9000W, Maleoon 910, 12288

10623 Points -29%Average of class Tablet (904 - 18343, n=65, last 2 years)

9590 Points -35% MemoryLenovo Yoga Tab PlusQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288

11834 Points Honor MagicPad 2Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288

10977 Points -7%Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (7426 - 14321, n=21)

10865 Points -8%Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+MediaTek Dimensity 9300+, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288

10633 Points -10%Huawei MatePad Pro 12.2 2024HiSilicon Kirin 9000W, Maleoon 910, 12288

8352 Points -29%Average of class Tablet (401 - 17963, n=65, last 2 years)

7381 Points -38% GraphicsSamsung Galaxy Tab S10+MediaTek Dimensity 9300+, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288

57192 Points +70%Lenovo Yoga Tab PlusQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288

33602 Points Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (26972 - 39727, n=21)

33403 Points -1%Honor MagicPad 2Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288

25642 Points -24%Average of class Tablet (88 - 57192, n=65, last 2 years)

17507 Points -48%Huawei MatePad Pro 12.2 2024HiSilicon Kirin 9000W, Maleoon 910, 12288

12436 Points -63% WebLenovo Yoga Tab PlusQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288

2056 Points Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (1661 - 2145, n=21)

1951 Points -5%Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+MediaTek Dimensity 9300+, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288

1938 Points -6%Honor MagicPad 2Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288

1893 Points -8%Huawei MatePad Pro 12.2 2024HiSilicon Kirin 9000W, Maleoon 910, 12288

1582 Points -23%Average of class Tablet (10 - 2370, n=65, last 2 years)

1572 Points -24%UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI

Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+MediaTek Dimensity 9300+, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288

74821 Points +316%Average of class Tablet (2597 - 76852, n=62, last 2 years)

18143 Points +1%Lenovo Yoga Tab PlusQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288

17975 Points Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (11487 - 18370, n=22)

16246 Points -10%Honor MagicPad 2Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288

13900 Points -23%Huawei MatePad Pro 12.2 2024HiSilicon Kirin 9000W, Maleoon 910, 12288

11155 Points -38%AImark - Score v3.x

Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (963 - 245629, n=19)

87302 Points +5888%Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+MediaTek Dimensity 9300+, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288

54948 Points +3669%Average of class Tablet (153 - 55794, n=50, last 2 years)

6503 Points +346%Lenovo Yoga Tab PlusQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288

1458 Points Honor MagicPad 2Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288

1231 Points -16%Huawei MatePad Pro 12.2 2024HiSilicon Kirin 9000W, Maleoon 910, 12288

899 Points -38%Geekbench AI

Single Precision TensorFlow NNAPI 1.2Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (235 - 2472, n=7)

662 Points +38%Lenovo Yoga Tab PlusQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288

480 Points Average of class Tablet (85 - 1140, n=15, last 2 years)

417 Points -13% Half Precision TensorFlow NNAPI 1.2Average of class Tablet (84 - 4545, n=15, last 2 years)

854 Points +78%Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (219 - 2460, n=7)

653 Points +36%Lenovo Yoga Tab PlusQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288

480 Points Quantized TensorFlow NNAPI 1.2Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (483 - 3667, n=7)

1209 Points +9%Average of class Tablet (130 - 4532, n=15, last 2 years)

1159 Points +5%Lenovo Yoga Tab PlusQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288

1108 Points AI Benchmark

Score V5Lenovo Yoga Tab PlusQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288

8305 Points Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (3092 - 8305, n=6)

4033 Points -51%Average of class Tablet (66.1 - 8305, n=11, last 2 years)

1268 Points -85%Honor MagicPad 2Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288

120 Points -99% Score V6Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (5170 - 9698, n=6)

7676 Points Average of class Tablet (70.4 - 17293, n=31, last 2 years)

3836 Points Huawei MatePad Pro 12.2 2024HiSilicon Kirin 9000W, Maleoon 910, 12288

390 Points

在图形处理性能方面,Adreno 750 是一款超级强大的解决方案,尽管它的图形处理性能并不出众。 三星Galaxy Tab S10+的 ARM Immortalis-G720 GPU在我们的测试中,在某些情况下速度更快一些。不过,我们的测试设备在显示复杂的 4K 图形时,帧率稳定在 30fps,1440p 时超过 60fps。

3DMark: Wild Life Extreme Unlimited | Wild Life Extreme | Solar Bay Score | Solar Bay Unlimited Score | Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score | Steel Nomad Light Score GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7: T-Rex Onscreen | 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen GFXBench 3.0: on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL | 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen GFXBench 3.1: on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen GFXBench: on screen Car Chase Onscreen | 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | 3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen 3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited

Apple iPad Pro 13 2024M4 10-Core GPU, M4 (10 cores), 1 TB NAND Flash

8889 Points +97%Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash

5289 Points +17%Lenovo Yoga Tab PlusAdreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash

4514 Points Honor MagicPad 2Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

3218 Points -29%Huawei MatePad Pro 12.2 2024Maleoon 910, Kirin 9000W, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

1187 Points -74%3DMark / Wild Life Extreme

Apple iPad Pro 13 2024M4 10-Core GPU, M4 (10 cores), 1 TB NAND Flash

8689 Points +83%Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash

5236 Points +10%Lenovo Yoga Tab PlusAdreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash

4742 Points Honor MagicPad 2Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

3301 Points -30%Huawei MatePad Pro 12.2 2024Maleoon 910, Kirin 9000W, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

1202 Points -75%3DMark / Solar Bay Score

Apple iPad Pro 13 2024M4 10-Core GPU, M4 (10 cores), 1 TB NAND Flash

14922 Points +213%Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash

8132 Points +71%Honor MagicPad 2Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

5468 Points +15%Lenovo Yoga Tab PlusAdreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash

4769 Points Huawei MatePad Pro 12.2 2024Maleoon 910, Kirin 9000W, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

Points -100%3DMark / Solar Bay Unlimited Score

Apple iPad Pro 13 2024M4 10-Core GPU, M4 (10 cores), 1 TB NAND Flash

15576 Points +224%Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash

8201 Points +71%Honor MagicPad 2Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

5458 Points +14%Lenovo Yoga Tab PlusAdreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash

4808 Points 3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score

Apple iPad Pro 13 2024M4 10-Core GPU, M4 (10 cores), 1 TB NAND Flash

3737 Points +300%Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash

1894 Points +103%Honor MagicPad 2Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

1071 Points +15%Lenovo Yoga Tab PlusAdreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash

935 Points Huawei MatePad Pro 12.2 2024Maleoon 910, Kirin 9000W, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

Points -100%3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Score

Apple iPad Pro 13 2024M4 10-Core GPU, M4 (10 cores), 1 TB NAND Flash

3583 Points +278%Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash

1965 Points +107%Honor MagicPad 2Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

1090 Points +15%Lenovo Yoga Tab PlusAdreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash

948 Points Huawei MatePad Pro 12.2 2024Maleoon 910, Kirin 9000W, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

Points -100%GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen

Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash

120 fps +100%Apple iPad Pro 13 2024M4 10-Core GPU, M4 (10 cores), 1 TB NAND Flash

120 fps +100%Huawei MatePad Pro 12.2 2024Maleoon 910, Kirin 9000W, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

90 fps +50%Honor MagicPad 2Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

60 fps 0%Lenovo Yoga Tab PlusAdreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash

60 fps GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen

Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash

767 fps +54%Apple iPad Pro 13 2024M4 10-Core GPU, M4 (10 cores), 1 TB NAND Flash

758.2 fps +52%Honor MagicPad 2Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

520 fps +4%Lenovo Yoga Tab PlusAdreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash

498 fps Huawei MatePad Pro 12.2 2024Maleoon 910, Kirin 9000W, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

276 fps -45%GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL

Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash

120 fps +100%Apple iPad Pro 13 2024M4 10-Core GPU, M4 (10 cores), 1 TB NAND Flash

120 fps +100%Huawei MatePad Pro 12.2 2024Maleoon 910, Kirin 9000W, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

65 fps +8%Honor MagicPad 2Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

60 fps 0%Lenovo Yoga Tab PlusAdreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash

60 fps GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen

Apple iPad Pro 13 2024M4 10-Core GPU, M4 (10 cores), 1 TB NAND Flash

530 fps +63%Lenovo Yoga Tab PlusAdreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash

325 fps Honor MagicPad 2Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

265 fps -18%Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash

261 fps -20%Huawei MatePad Pro 12.2 2024Maleoon 910, Kirin 9000W, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

142 fps -56%GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen

Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash

115 fps +92%Apple iPad Pro 13 2024M4 10-Core GPU, M4 (10 cores), 1 TB NAND Flash

106.2 fps +77%Lenovo Yoga Tab PlusAdreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash

60 fps Honor MagicPad 2Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

59 fps -2%Huawei MatePad Pro 12.2 2024Maleoon 910, Kirin 9000W, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

40 fps -33%GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen

Apple iPad Pro 13 2024M4 10-Core GPU, M4 (10 cores), 1 TB NAND Flash

399.5 fps +66%Lenovo Yoga Tab PlusAdreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash

240 fps Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash

219 fps -9%Honor MagicPad 2Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

200 fps -17%Huawei MatePad Pro 12.2 2024Maleoon 910, Kirin 9000W, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

106 fps -56%GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen

Apple iPad Pro 13 2024M4 10-Core GPU, M4 (10 cores), 1 TB NAND Flash

84.1 fps +43%Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash

78 fps +32%Lenovo Yoga Tab PlusAdreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash

59 fps Honor MagicPad 2Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

42 fps -29%Huawei MatePad Pro 12.2 2024Maleoon 910, Kirin 9000W, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

21 fps -64%GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen

Apple iPad Pro 13 2024M4 10-Core GPU, M4 (10 cores), 1 TB NAND Flash

283.9 fps +107%Lenovo Yoga Tab PlusAdreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash

137 fps Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash

135 fps -1%Honor MagicPad 2Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

110 fps -20%Huawei MatePad Pro 12.2 2024Maleoon 910, Kirin 9000W, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

46 fps -66%GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen

Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash

67 fps +24%Apple iPad Pro 13 2024M4 10-Core GPU, M4 (10 cores), 1 TB NAND Flash

60 fps +11%Lenovo Yoga Tab PlusAdreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash

54 fps Honor MagicPad 2Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

35 fps -35%Huawei MatePad Pro 12.2 2024Maleoon 910, Kirin 9000W, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

16 fps -70%GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen

Apple iPad Pro 13 2024M4 10-Core GPU, M4 (10 cores), 1 TB NAND Flash

114.5 fps +71%Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash

72 fps +7%Lenovo Yoga Tab PlusAdreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash

67 fps Honor MagicPad 2Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

55 fps -18%Huawei MatePad Pro 12.2 2024Maleoon 910, Kirin 9000W, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

23 fps -66%GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen

Apple iPad Pro 13 2024M4 10-Core GPU, M4 (10 cores), 1 TB NAND Flash

99.8 fps +66%Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash

91 fps +52%Lenovo Yoga Tab PlusAdreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash

60 fps Honor MagicPad 2Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

53 fps -12%Huawei MatePad Pro 12.2 2024Maleoon 910, Kirin 9000W, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

27 fps -55%GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen

Apple iPad Pro 13 2024M4 10-Core GPU, M4 (10 cores), 1 TB NAND Flash

339.7 fps +103%Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash

176 fps +5%Lenovo Yoga Tab PlusAdreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash

167 fps Honor MagicPad 2Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

144 fps -14%Huawei MatePad Pro 12.2 2024Maleoon 910, Kirin 9000W, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

64 fps -62%GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen

Apple iPad Pro 13 2024M4 10-Core GPU, M4 (10 cores), 1 TB NAND Flash

55.1 fps +84%Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash

35 fps +17%Lenovo Yoga Tab PlusAdreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash

30 fps Honor MagicPad 2Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

24 fps -20%Huawei MatePad Pro 12.2 2024Maleoon 910, Kirin 9000W, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

10 fps -67%

上网时,您还可以期待充足的电量,即使在加载复杂的网站时,等待时间也非常短。

Jetstream 2 | Speedometer 2.0 | Speedometer 3 | WebXPRT 4 | Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1 Jetstream 2 - 2.0 Total Score

Apple iPad Pro 13 2024 (Safari Mobile 17)

333.7 Points +44%Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus (Chrome 132)

231.7 Points Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+ (Chrome 130)

177.483 Points -23%Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (64.1 - 241, n=24)

156.7 Points -32%Huawei MatePad Pro 12.2 2024 (Chrome 130.0.6723.102)

155.836 Points -33%Average of class Tablet (23.3 - 395, n=69, last 2 years)

154.7 Points -33%Honor MagicPad 2 (Chrome 128.0.6613.146)

134.356 Points -42%Speedometer 2.0 - Result 2.0

Apple iPad Pro 13 2024 (Safari Mobile 17)

572 runs/min +95%Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus (Chrome 132)

294 runs/min Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+ (Chrome 130)

256 runs/min -13%Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (69.6 - 311, n=19)

214 runs/min -27%Average of class Tablet (2.59 - 790, n=54, last 2 years)

211 runs/min -28%Huawei MatePad Pro 12.2 2024 (Chrome 130.0.6723.102)

208 runs/min -29%Honor MagicPad 2 (Chrome 128.0.6613.146)

197 runs/min -33%Speedometer 3 - Score 3.0

Apple iPad Pro 13 2024 (Safari Mobile 17)

32 runs/min +86%Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus (Chrome 132)

17.2 runs/min Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+ (Chrome 130)

15.2 runs/min -12%Average of class Tablet (1.25 - 49.1, n=65, last 2 years)

14.4 runs/min -16%Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4.3 - 19.1, n=15)

13.1 runs/min -24%Huawei MatePad Pro 12.2 2024 (Chrome 130.0.6723.102)

12.5 runs/min -27%Honor MagicPad 2 (Chrome 128.0.6613.146)

11.9 runs/min -31%WebXPRT 4 - Overall

Apple iPad Pro 13 2024 (Safari Mobile 17)

315 Points +92%Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+ (Chrome 130)

190 Points +16%Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus (Chrome 132)

164 Points Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (69 - 212, n=22)

160.8 Points -2%Huawei MatePad Pro 12.2 2024 (Chrome 130.0.6723.102)

160 Points -2%Honor MagicPad 2 (Chrome 128.0.6613.146)

155 Points -5%Average of class Tablet (30 - 376, n=71, last 2 years)

143 Points -13%Octane V2 - Total Score

Apple iPad Pro 13 2024 (Safari Mobile 17)

105178 Points +50%Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus (Chrome 132)

70252 Points Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+ (Chrome 130)

67938 Points -3%Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (25953 - 75238, n=27)

54099 Points -23%Huawei MatePad Pro 12.2 2024 (Chrome 130.0.6723.102)

46687 Points -34%Average of class Tablet (763 - 138481, n=91, last 2 years)

46242 Points -34%Honor MagicPad 2 (Chrome 128.0.6613.146)

42032 Points -40%Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total

Average of class Tablet (243 - 27101, n=80, last 2 years)

2493 ms * -330%Honor MagicPad 2 (Chrome 128.0.6613.146)

842.2 ms * -45%Huawei MatePad Pro 12.2 2024 (Chrome 130.0.6723.102)

836.4 ms * -44%Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (510 - 2066, n=25)

801 ms * -38%Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+ (Chrome 130)

639.3 ms * -10%Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus (Chrome 132)

579.9 ms * Apple iPad Pro 13 2024 (Safari Mobile 17)

318.8 ms * +45%* ... smaller is better

联想选择了速度极快的 UFS 4.0 存储系统。遗憾的是,我们无法将其存储速度与 iPad Pro的存储速度进行比较,因为 iPadOS 上没有存储基准测试。不过,我们的测试设备在Android 平板电脑中仍然名列前茅。

因此,在使用 Yoga Tab Plus 时,没有什么能阻挡它快速传输数据和缩短加载时间。

Lenovo Yoga Tab PlusHuawei MatePad Pro 12.2 2024Honor MagicPad 2Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+Average 256 GB UFS 4.0 FlashAverage of class TabletAndroBench 3-53%-5%-18%20%-26% Sequential Read 256KB (MB/s)38681925.89 -50%2025.54 -48%3574.3 -8%3627 ?(1493 - 4384, n=51) -6%1868 ?(126.9 - 4093, n=84, last 2 years) -52% Sequential Write 256KB (MB/s)3047.61461.8 -52%2003.53 -34%554.67 -82%2681 ?(555 - 3484, n=51) -12%1422 ?(80.4 - 3773, n=84, last 2 years) -53% Random Read 4KB (MB/s)241.2313.92 30%298.27 24%218.43 -9%379 ?(218 - 483, n=51) 57%252 ?(20.1 - 475, n=84, last 2 years) 4% Random Write 4KB (MB/s)290.9531.89 83%401.95 38%374.09 29%405 ?(50.7 - 989, n=51) 39%287 ?(9.1 - 989, n=84, last 2 years) -1%

游戏 - 超级流畅的游戏在游戏测试中,我们玩了一些最新的游戏,并使用GameBench 软件记录了帧速率。软件记录帧率。在运行《PUBG Mobile》时,我们发现了一个令人惊喜的现象:在低设置下,平板电脑的帧率最高可达 120fps,而且这一帧率也保持得非常稳定。

玄心冲击》也运行得很流畅;我们可以设置最高 60fps,即使在很高的设置下也能保持稳定。

因此,联想 Yoga Tab Plus 是一款非常可靠的游戏平板电脑,可以达到很高的帧率。操控也很流畅。

源泉冲击

PUBG Mobile

Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus; Genshin Impact; lowest 120 fps: Ø60 (56-61) Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus; Genshin Impact; highest 120 fps: Ø60 (57-61) Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus; PUBG Mobile; Smooth: Ø116.2 (67-120) Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus; PUBG Mobile; Ultra HD: Ø39.9 (39-41)

排放 - 负载情况下几乎不加热温度联想 Yoga Tab Plus 的超大表面积还能让 SoC 的余热轻松散发,即使没有风扇也是如此。在我们的测试中,该设备在长时间负载后的最高机箱温度达到了 41.4 °C,我们可以用手感觉到,但并没有不舒服的感觉。

SoC 的性能也基本保持不变,在多次重复测试后,帧速率的下降幅度很小。

Max. LoadIdle

35.9 °C41.4 °C29 °C 32.4 °C34.2 °C29.1 °C 31.8 °C31.4 °C29.1 °C

Maximum: 41.4 °CAverage: 32.7 °C

31.1 °C39.7 °C36.8 °C30.2 °C31.4 °C34.9 °C29.5 °C31.8 °C32.4 °C

Maximum: 39.7 °CAverage: 33.1 °C Power Supply (max.) 42.6 °C | Room Temperature 19 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260Max. LoadIdle

22.3 °C21.7 °C21.9 °C 21.9 °C22 °C21.9 °C 22.3 °C22.4 °C22.2 °C

Maximum: 22.4 °CAverage: 22.1 °C

22.1 °C22.3 °C22.4 °C22.1 °C21.9 °C22 °C22.7 °C22.7 °C22.5 °C

Maximum: 22.7 °CAverage: 22.3 °C Power Supply (max.) 34.6 °C | Room Temperature 19 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 32.7 °C / 91 F, compared to the average of 30 °C / 86 F for the devices in the class Tablet.(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 41.4 °C / 107 F, compared to the average of 33.6 °C / 92 F, ranging from 20.7 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 39.7 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 33.2 °C / 92 F(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 22.1 °C / 72 F, compared to the device average of 30 °C / 86 F.

3DMark Steel Nomad stress test

3DMark

Wild Life Stress Test StabilityApple iPad Pro 13 2024M4 10-Core GPU, M4 (10 cores), 1 TB NAND Flash

100 % 0%Huawei MatePad Pro 12.2 2024Maleoon 910, Kirin 9000W, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

99.7 % 0%Lenovo Yoga Tab PlusAdreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash

99.7 % Honor MagicPad 2Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

73.6 % -26%Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash

63.2 % -37% Wild Life Extreme Stress TestHuawei MatePad Pro 12.2 2024Maleoon 910, Kirin 9000W, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

99.6 % +22%Honor MagicPad 2Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

89.3 % +9%Lenovo Yoga Tab PlusAdreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash

81.8 % Apple iPad Pro 13 2024M4 10-Core GPU, M4 (10 cores), 1 TB NAND Flash

66.5 % -19%Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash

59.5 % -27% Solar Bay Stress Test StabilityHonor MagicPad 2Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

93.7 % +3%Lenovo Yoga Tab PlusAdreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash

91.3 % Apple iPad Pro 13 2024M4 10-Core GPU, M4 (10 cores), 1 TB NAND Flash

71.3 % -22%Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash

65.1 % -29% Steel Nomad Light Stress Test StabilityHonor MagicPad 2Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

95.9 % +11%Lenovo Yoga Tab PlusAdreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash

86.6 % Apple iPad Pro 13 2024M4 10-Core GPU, M4 (10 cores), 1 TB NAND Flash

67.8 % -22%Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash

61.9 % -29%Huawei MatePad Pro 12.2 2024Maleoon 910, Kirin 9000W, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

% -100%

Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø23.7 (22.2-27.1) Huawei MatePad Pro 12.2 2024 Maleoon 910, Kirin 9000W, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø7.2 (7.19-7.22) Apple iPad Pro 13 2024 M4 10-Core GPU, M4 (10 cores), 1 TB NAND Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test: Ø37.5 (34.3-51.6) Honor MagicPad 2 Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø18.1 (17.6-19.7) Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+ Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø19.6 (17.7-29.7) Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø60.4 (60.3-60.5) Huawei MatePad Pro 12.2 2024 Maleoon 910, Kirin 9000W, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø26.6 (26.6-26.7) Apple iPad Pro 13 2024 M4 10-Core GPU, M4 (10 cores), 1 TB NAND Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø60 (60-60) Honor MagicPad 2 Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø64.5 (53.4-72.6) Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+ Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø64.9 (58.9-93.1) Huawei MatePad Pro 12.2 2024 Maleoon 910, Kirin 9000W, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø26.5 (26.4-26.5) Apple iPad Pro 13 2024 M4 10-Core GPU, M4 (10 cores), 1 TB NAND Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability: Ø144.6 (128.1-193.8) Honor MagicPad 2 Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø71.7 (69.5-77.2) Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+ Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø68.1 (60.1-107.9) Apple iPad Pro 13 2024 M4 10-Core GPU, M4 (10 cores), 1 TB NAND Flash; Solar Bay Unlimited Stress Test Stability: Ø40.7 (39.2-53.2) Honor MagicPad 2 Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Solar Bay Unlimited Stress Test Stability; 1.0.6.5: Ø16.6 (16.4-17.5) Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+ Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Unlimited Stress Test Stability; 1.0.11.1: Ø18.2 (16.5-25.8) Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.11.1: Ø22.7 (22.1-24.2) Apple iPad Pro 13 2024 M4 10-Core GPU, M4 (10 cores), 1 TB NAND Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability: Ø38.8 (36.3-50.9) Honor MagicPad 2 Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.6.5: Ø16.7 (16.4-17.5) Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+ Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.11.1: Ø17.8 (16.1-24.7) Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.1.1.3: Ø10.8 (10.4-12.1) Apple iPad Pro 13 2024 M4 10-Core GPU, M4 (10 cores), 1 TB NAND Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability: Ø20.4 (18.9-27.8) Honor MagicPad 2 Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.0.0.15: Ø7.85 (7.73-8.06) Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+ Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.1.1.3: Ø9.17 (8.34-13.5)

正面热图

热图返回发言人由于配备了两个高音扬声器和四个低音扬声器,联想 Yoga Tab Plus 拥有出色的音响系统,可以很好地再现音乐和电影音效。

当然,在最大音量时,它的声音有点不清晰,而且往往有点过大。但如果将音量调低一点,就能获得圆润、多层次的音效,可以轻松分辨出单个乐器、声音或音效。

为了获得更好的音效,我们建议您通过 USB 或蓝牙连接外置扬声器或耳机。如果您喜欢使用无线选项,可以使用最常用的音频编解码器,如 AAC、aptX 或 LDAC。不过,那些喜欢使用更奇特编解码器的用户就只能望洋兴叹了。

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus audio analysis(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.3 dB)Bass 100 - 315 Hz(±) | reduced bass - on average 12.3% lower than median(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.9% delta to prev. frequency)Mids 400 - 2000 Hz(+) | balanced mids - only 4.7% away from median(+) | mids are linear (4.2% delta to prev. frequency)Highs 2 - 16 kHz(+) | balanced highs - only 3.7% away from median(+) | highs are linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz(+) | overall sound is linear (11.4% difference to median)Compared to same class» 12% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 84% worse» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 20%, worst was 129%Compared to all devices tested» 7% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 91% worse» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+ audio analysis(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.6 dB)Bass 100 - 315 Hz(±) | reduced bass - on average 9.1% lower than median(±) | linearity of bass is average (10% delta to prev. frequency)Mids 400 - 2000 Hz(+) | balanced mids - only 3.5% away from median(+) | mids are linear (3.5% delta to prev. frequency)Highs 2 - 16 kHz(+) | balanced highs - only 4.1% away from median(+) | highs are linear (5.9% delta to prev. frequency)Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)Compared to same class» 7% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 90% worse» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 20%, worst was 129%Compared to all devices tested» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 94% worse» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

电池寿命 - 负载消耗大,运行时间长耗电量与其他平板电脑相比,它在闲置模式下的功耗很低。另一方面,在负载模式下,联想 Yoga Tab Plus 并不是最省钱的,耗电量高达 18.5 瓦。

如果使用合适的充电器,该平板电脑的最大充电功率可达 45 瓦。不过,由于电池容量较大,充满电需要 2:15 小时。

Power Consumption

Off / Standby 0.1 / 0.2 WattIdle 1.5 / 1.8 / 2.3 Watt

Load

11.1 / 18.5 Watt

Key:

min: ,

med: ,

max: Metrahit Energy

Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus10200 mAhHuawei MatePad Pro 12.2 202410100 mAhApple iPad Pro 13 202410209 mAhHonor MagicPad 210050 mAhSamsung Galaxy Tab S10+10090 mAhAverage Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 Average of class Tablet Power Consumption-88%-60%-109%-73%22%-42%Idle Minimum * (Watt)1.52.49 -66%1.94 -29%3.6 -140%3.05 -103%0.969 ?(0.4 - 1.55, n=22) 35%2.04 ?(0.7 - 5.6, n=78, last 2 years) -36%Idle Average * (Watt)1.86.42 -257%5.02 -179%6.52 -262%4.57 -154%1.721 ?(0.81 - 8.99, n=22) 4%4.05 ?(1 - 9.2, n=78, last 2 years) -125%Idle Maximum * (Watt)2.36.61 -187%5.05 -120%6.54 -184%4.65 -102%1.891 ?(0.85 - 9.02, n=22) 18%4.4 ?(1.3 - 9.5, n=78, last 2 years) -91%Load Average * (Watt)11.17.58 32%8.71 22%10.63 4%13.35 -20%8.91 ?(3.34 - 14.7, n=21) 20%9.32 ?(2.5 - 34.9, n=70, last 2 years) 16%Load Maximum * (Watt)18.511.83 36%16.93 8%11.57 37%15.55 16%12.1 ?(3.53 - 22, n=21) 35%13.6 ?(4.6 - 41.6, n=70, last 2 years) 26%* ... smaller is better

Power consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø7.83 (1.682-16.4) Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.317 (1.168-1.989)

Power consumption: GFXbench (150 cd/m²)

Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø15.2 (13.9-18.5) Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.317 (1.168-1.989)

运行时间Yoga Tab Plus 的电池容量为 10,200 毫安时。这几乎与 iPad Pro 13尽管Apple 在某些情况下的效率明显更高。

尽管如此,Yoga Tab Plus 的续航时间总体还算不错:在我们的 WLAN 测试中,它的续航时间达到了 12:48 小时,但与更小巧的平板电脑或智能手机相比,如此大的屏幕和高分辨率显然会让人吃不消。我们注意到,在满负荷状态下的耗时为 3:39,但在这种情况下,Apple 。

通常情况下,一个工作日甚至一天观看一部完整的连续剧都不需要给平板电脑充电。

Battery Runtime

Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)

23h 42min

WiFi Websurfing

12h 48min

Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p

16h 38min

Load (maximum brightness)

3h 39min

Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus10200 mAhHuawei MatePad Pro 12.2 202410100 mAhApple iPad Pro 13 202410209 mAhHonor MagicPad 210050 mAhSamsung Galaxy Tab S10+10090 mAhBattery runtime-2%22%-6%-34%Reader / Idle (h)23.722.7 -4%30.2 27%24.5 3%H.264 (h)16.617.8 7%19.6 18%14.7 -11%WiFi v1.3 (h)12.812.5 -2%12.5 -2%10.1 -21%8.4 -34%Load (h)3.73.4 -8%5.4 46%3.9 5%

Notebookcheck 总评分联想 Yoga Tab Plus 评测。测试设备由联想德国公司提供。联想 Yoga Tab Plus 是一款配置丰富的大尺寸平板电脑,甚至可以与 iPad Pro 相媲美。

即使在所有方面都无法与 iPad Pro 匹敌,联想 Yoga Tab Plus 也能以更低的价格提供出色的性能,无闪烁的屏幕可让用户轻松工作,音响系统也相当不错,因此它的娱乐性肯定也不会被忽视。

Back to the verdict

Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus

- 02/06/2025 v8

Florian Schmitt

Chassis85 / 98 → 87%

Keyboard77 / 80 → 96%

Pointing Device96%

Connectivity51 / 69 → 74%

Weight81 / 40-88 → 85%

Battery89%

Display83%

Games Performance47 / 65 → 72%

Application Performance75 / 92 → 81%

AI Performance43%

Temperature93%

Noise100%

Audio88 / 91 → 97%

Camera60 / 90 → 67%

Average67%

86%

Tablet - Weighted Average

CO2 EmissionsNo DataMaterials25%Packaging85%Power Use95.7%Repairability36%Software Updates56.7% Total Sustainability Score: 49.7%

More articles related to this deviceLenovo Yoga Tab Plus (Yoga Tab Series)Review•一款出色的Android 平板电脑,凸显 iPad Air 的不足 - 联想 Yoga Tab 评测 |News•与新款三星 S Pen 相比,联想 Tab Pen Pro 的性能如何| 评测结论 |News•如果您想为大学或学校购买平板电脑节省开支,联想 Yoga Tab 绝对是您的不二之选。 |Review•联想Yoga Tab 11评测--有吸引力的Android 平板电脑,但有一些意想不到的不足之处 |Review•联想Yoga Tab 13平板电脑评测--拥有强大音效的多媒体平板电脑 |Review•联想 Yoga Tab 3 10 平板电脑简短评测

TransparencyThe selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

Please share our article, every link counts!

Editor of the original article: Daisy Dickson - Translator - 464 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2023Translator: Ninh Ngoc Duy - Editorial Assistant - 699564 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2008contact me via:

Facebook